|
Minnesota IP Crops to be Promoted -- Final List As of 20 December 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identity Preserved Crop
|
Marketable Characteristics
|
Expert Comments
|
Promo (Y/N)
|
Only These Countries
|
|
Soybeans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clear Hilum, Food Grade
|
Protein rich. Primary use is for tofu and soymilk.
|
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clear Hilum, Food Grade, Natto
|
5.5mm maximum, thin seed coat, high carbohydrate.
|
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Amino Acids (Methionine, Cystine)
|
|
Be year before known.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Isoflavone
|
Health food, nutriceuticals, pharmiceuticals.
|
Efficient testing available 2002.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Oil
|
|
MN HO because line dvlp here had HO.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Protein
|
Elevated protein (weather affects level).
|
Fair number of varieties for MN.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low-Linolenic
|
50% less linolenic acid. Increases oxidation stability of oil. Reduced need for hydrogenation which produces trans fatty acids.
|
G2. Could be for G1.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GMO
|
Not genetically engineered to contain generic material from another species.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GMO, European Standards
|
|
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic, Food Grade
|
No synthetic chemicals on plant or in soil.
|
|
Y
|
Japan, US
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trait-Consistent
|
|
Possible with econ NIR testing.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trait-Specific, Other (specify)
|
|
Possible with econ NIR testing.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variety-Specific (specify)
|
|
Still some demand.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
Old, outdated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blue
|
|
Grown MN/ND. Yield low.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food-Grade yellow
|
High vitreous endosperm. Used for corn meal. Hard starch.
|
Current market south of here.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Oil
|
Avg 7.6% oil. Feed--swine/poultry-energy dense, higher protein-replaces energy substitutes.
|
Yields lower. Oil content varies with current stock.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GMO
|
Not genetically modified through biotechnology procedures. Not treated with chemical pesticides during storage.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nutritionally Dense
|
Stacked traits. Feed--Elevated protein, lysine, sulfur amino acids, threonine, tryptophan, oil, phosphorous; improved nutritional consistency. Best poultry/swine.
|
Very promising because of stacked trait. Ready for G2 in 2 years. Stacked traits means highest value to user and same cost to farmer.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic
|
Non-GMO. No use of synthetic fertilizers, herbicides, insecticides, fungicides.
|
Appears to be growing interest. Small quantities.
|
Y
|
Japan, US
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trait-Specific, Other (specify)
|
|
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waxy, Yellow
|
Feed--99% highly digestible amylopectin starch. Wet milling--amylopectin starch has unique characteristics for use in end-products.
|
Yields good.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wheat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hard Red Spring
|
High protein. Bread products.
|
Most commonly grown.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hard Red Spring / Dark Northern Spring
|
High protein. Bread products. High vitreous cereal
|
Grade of HRS. If dry, more likely to produce DNS grade. Most commonly grown.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hard Red Winter
|
Bread products.
|
Some grown. Poor price.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic
|
|
|
Y
|
Japan, US
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trait-Specific (specify)
|
|
Some users test for specific traits.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variety-Specific (specify)
|
|
Some export customers specify HRS variety to be planted.
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spelt
|
Protein higher than hard red wheat. Lysine lower. Food.
|
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|